Blackwater / Xe / IDS / Academi - R2

Dedicado a las compañias privadas de servicios militares, seguridad e inteligencia.
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

Blackwater lleva más de dos años ofreciendo servicios de seguridad marítimos. Puse esta composición en el foro el pasado 23 de Abril:

Imagen

Es el MacArthur justo antes de su compra por Blackwater Worldwide, y si no me equivoco el grupo de servicios marítimos está dirigido por Tom Ridenour.

El MacArthur no se compró y modificó pensando en acciones antipiratería, sino como plataforma para ensayar doctrinas, procedimientos y equipos para tareas de seguridad, como les explicaron a los asistentes a la presentación de BW Maritime Security Solutions en una reunión en el Nauticus de Norfolk.

Dudo que España contrate a Blackwater para una tarea así, más bien serían las organizaciones internacionales como la ONU, el International Maritime Organization, etc... los que contratarían estos servicios. Aunque vamos, con la "original" idea del límite de 3000 hombres en operaciones y con todos los organismos militares en los que estamos metidos subcontratando los hospitales, servicios de asistencia humanitaria y el desminado (que es a lo que nos hemos dedicado en misiones internacionales) es cuestión de tiempo que nuestras FAS tengan que asumir que esos 3000 hombres se tendrán que dedicar a operaciones militares de combate y seguridad, no a hacer de ONGs de uniforme, y si los 3000 tios tienen que andar ajustados para esas tareas la pura necesidad hará que contratemos PMCs para apoyar los despliegues, incluso en tareas que a algún oficial le daría un ictus al verlo. :roll:


(Editado para ajustar el tamaño de la fotografia, que descompensaba el foro)
Última edición por Loopster el 20 May 2008 19:04, editado 1 vez en total.
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Charlie
Agente de Campo
Agente de Campo
Mensajes: 128
Registrado: 08 May 2008 14:22
Ubicación: entre nieve...

Mensaje por Charlie »

Gracias Loopster por las fotografias del MacArthur, pero según leo este barco no se compró con fines de seguridad marítima contra piratería, pero se puede dar el caso de ser empleado actualmente para este servicio.
El problema de esta piratería creo que también está en los que están detras de estos piratas, y según se a publicado, empresas de "mercenarios" como les gusta nombrarlas en los medios, son los que a través de enlaces en el Reino Unido, se habrían encargado de las negociaciones para el pago del rescate, por lo que entiendo que detrás de los piratas existen empresas privadas. :twisted:

¿ Contratar una PMC sería una solución?
No ser noticia es buena señal
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

¿Que detrás de los piratas de Somalia hay PMCs? ni de coña, a Londres no fueron a negociar con los piratas o con sus "representantes", fueron a hablar con la aseguradora, que es la seguramente (si el barco tenía el seguro al día) puso el dinero. Fijate que incluso se ha filtrado a la prensa que fueron los del CNI quienes llevaron el dinero en mano a los piratas, si detrás de los piratas estuviera una empresa privada pues no habría hecho falta para nada.

Es lo que tiene todo el hype alrededor de las PMCs, que ya salen hasta en la prensa rosa (no es coña, he visto un artículo de una revista de cotilleos americana sobre un empresario del sector :lol: ), así que ahora hay PMCs en todo, aunque las noticias haya que inventárselas, como el rollo ese de españoles con Blackwater en Iraq, ¡en 2002! :lol:


Como explico un poco más arriba el MacArthur no se compró pensando en usarlo como buque antipiratas, sino como testeador de equipos y doctrina, además de como transporte de personal y carga.

En la web de Blackwater encontramos un par de párrafos muy ilustrativos:
Maritime Mobility escribió:
Maritime assets owned and operated by Blackwater Worldwide include the McArthur, a multi purpose vessel designed to carry not only the ship's crew, but additional personnel. This feature makes it unlike most other cargo type vessels. Its self sufficient operational capabilities make it a valuable alternative to meet the customer's need for transport in domestic and international waters. Blackwater Worldwide also has accessibility to additional small to medium sized watercraft with multiple capabilities. Blackwater Worldwide provides numerous innovative and reliable options to provide first-rate support of the maritime needs of its customers.
Maritime Platforms escribió:
Blackwater Worldwide’s pioneering spirit and resourcefulness is seen in the McArthur, a 183 foot ship. The McArthur was reconfigured and modified in 2006 and is now a Blackwater Worldwide Maritime Security Support Craft. The McArthur is a multi-purpose maritime vessel designed to support military and law enforcement training, peacekeeping, and stability operations worldwide. With the latest technology and innovation, Blackwater Worldwide now provides a state-of-the art vessel with numerous capacities. The McArthur offers a full array of products, including state-of-the-art navigation systems and satellite based communication systems. Blackwater Worldwide is proud to offer the most modern technology and the most resourceful maritime solutions.

¿Sería una solución contra la piratería el contratar a una PMC? a menos que sea una PMC muy grande no creo que una sola pueda, pero todo depende de que solicite el contrato.

¿Podría contratarse a una o varias empresas que pongan centros de coordinación, equipos de respuesta en helicópteros a bordo de buques con capacidad para operarlos, patrulleras vigilando las zonas con mayor índice de ataque y guardias a bordo de los buques? sí, y seguramente sería muy efectivo para proteger a los buques, pero mejor aún...

¿Podría contratarse a una o varias empresas para que acaben con grupos dedicados a la piratería actuando en zonas sin gobierno y estados fallidos o con el consentimiento de las autoridades reconocidas a nivel ONU? si alguien tuviera huevos para realizar semejante encargo sin duda que se podría hacer también.

Un par de centros de coordinación 24/7 (que pueden estar perfectamente en un país occidental), un par de instalaciones para los contratistas en el terreno, 3 o 4 buques de buen tonelaje que permitan llevar 3 helicópteros en cada uno, unos 15 helicópteros (Dyncorp opera bastantes más en Afganistán ahora mismo, Blackwater supera la treintena solo en Iraq), 350 contratistas occidentales y unos 500 guardias contratados localmente más el personal de apoyo. Se reunen pruebas contra los grupos piratas, se prepara un dossier, se tramita para conseguir la autorización (ONU, autoridades locales,...) y a asaltar los campamentos, las playas donde tienen sus barcazas, los buques nodriza, etc. Arrestar a todos los posibles y dárselos a la autoridad competente, destruir arsenales y dejar claro que la piratería se paga con la vida o en una cárcel somalí.

Probablemente resulte incluso más barato que la TF150.
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

Breve historia empresarial de Blackwater, ojo a los primeros contratos de la CIA en Afganistán y Pakistán, a la jugada de tener contratistas en lugar de empleados para seguir en la categoría de "pequeña empresa" y los contratos en Japón con Chenega y en Indonesia con la US Navy:
May 17, 2008 (McClatchy Newspapers - McClatchy-Tribune News Service via COMTEX) --

-- Blackwater was all over the news last fall, and the news wasn't good. The North Carolina company created a diplomatic crisis when its guards killed 17 Iraqi civilians in a Baghdad square.

The Iraqi government promised to evict the company from Iraq. Blackwater's reclusive owner, Erik Prince, was called to Congress to testify; and afterward, he began a PR blitz of the national media. He even appeared on "60 Minutes."

Today, however, the trouble has subsided. Last month, the State Department renewed its contract with Blackwater to provide security in Iraq. It's still in Afghanistan for the military. In the fall, Blackwater won a new contract, for $92 million, to fly soldiers and cargo around Pakistan and Afghanistan for the Army. And the company was one of five picked to support the Pentagon's Counter Narcoterrorism Technology Program, a five-year contract worth up to $15 billion.

As the company grows, so do its headaches: a persistent congressional investigation, several high-profile lawsuits and a federal weapons investigation. Still, Blackwater is thriving because of its aggressive and entrepreneurial business culture and a strong network of Republican connections. The company has hired extensively from the top levels of the CIA, Defense Department and State Department, and named the former No. 2 official at the CIA to its Board of Advisors.

"Their connections certainly help a lot," said Peter Singer, an expert on military contractors at the Brookings Institution. "But they may be a vulnerability in the future, if the regime changes in Washington."

This is a company that barely existed at the start of the decade; Blackwater grew from $204,000 in federal contracts in 2000 to almost $600 million in 2006. Its rise is a case study in business timing and the power of financial and political capital to take advantage of a new market.

Blackwater Lodge and Training Center was the brainchild of Al Clark, a Navy SEAL and instructor. Dissatisfied with the Navy's rented training grounds, Clark told colleagues he would open his own when he left the service. Clark hooked up with Erik Prince, a young Navy SEAL who shared his interest in training. Clark didn't know it at the time, but Prince was an heir to a billion-dollar auto-parts fortune.

When the two broke ground on Blackwater Lodge and Training Center in Currituck and Camden counties in northeast North Carolina in 1997, the timing was good. The military had closed and consolidated bases after the Cold War and neglected training facilities. Blackwater built the largest shooting facility in the country, with indoor ranges, mock urban landscapes, a 1,200-yard firing range, driving tracks and a lake for naval training. Blackwater boasted it could design any sort of training a client might want.

The location was excellent, within four hours of the Pentagon in Washington, and Fort Bragg and Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. The country's biggest naval base in Norfolk, Va., was less than an hour away. Despite the steady stream of business, Blackwater wasn't making money. Clark recalled how Prince summoned him to his office, on Christmas Eve 1999 and said, "I want this place profitable tomorrow."

Clark said his relations with Prince went downhill when Prince complained that he was training the students so well that no one would come back for more training.

Clark left Blackwater in the summer of 2000. Business was growing steadily, Clark said, but the company wasn't making a profit.

"There are two people who put Blackwater on the map," Clark said _ "Al Clark and Osama bin Laden."

After the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the demand for training from military and law enforcement filled Blackwater's ranges and classrooms.

Blackwater's most lucrative line of business wouldn't be in the Eastern North Carolina town of Moyock, but overseas. It was the brainchild of a former CIA employee, Jamie Smith.

While working at Blackwater before Sept. 11, Smith had suggested that Blackwater go into the private security business, guarding businessmen or government officials. Prince was initially skeptical, but warmed to the idea after the attacks on New York City and the Pentagon.

Prince contacted Alvin "Buzzy" Krongard, the No. 2 official at the CIA. Krongard had known Prince since at least 1999, when Krongard's son, a Navy SEAL, had trained at Blackwater, according to Al Clark. Krongard had visited Blackwater and shot at the firing ranges, Clark said. (In October, Krongard stepped down from Blackwater's Board of Advisors because his brother, Howard Krongard, was the State Department inspector general responsible for investigating Blackwater. Howard Krongard later resigned.)

The CIA was stretched thin in the aftermath of Sept. 11 and the invasion of Afghanistan. Blackwater landed a sole-source, no-bid contract to provide security at CIA stations in Afghanistan.

When Blackwater won the contract, the company had no one to staff it. Smith advertised for security contractors in the Washington Post, according to author Robert Young Pelton. Smith led the security team when it arrived in the early spring of 2002.

The contract was not a big one; it called for 16 Blackwater security personnel, plus dozens of Afghan guards hired locally. But it was profitable, a Blackwater budget spreadsheet shows. Blackwater expected a 26 percent profit on the job.

Most important, the contract was a start, a foot in the door of what would expand into a billion-dollar industry once the U.S. invaded Iraq.

The invasion created a huge demand for private security in Iraq. Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld sent about half the troops recommended by his Army chief of staff. There weren't enough soldiers to secure the country, let alone protect U.S. diplomats and civilian workers.

In August 2003, Blackwater won a $27 million sole-source contract to guard Paul Bremer, the head of the Coalition Provisional Authority and probably the top assassination target of insurgents.

The contract called for helicopters to fly Bremer around Iraq. Blackwater was well positioned for that; the company had bought a Florida aviation company four months earlier.

Peter Singer, an expert on private military contractors, said this was typical of Blackwater's business savvy.

"They are very good and very savvy at identifying market needs and pushing hard to enter into those markets, even before clients have recognized the need," Singer said.

The private security business turned Blackwater into a heavyweight government contractor; the company went from $204,911 in government contracts in fiscal 2000 to $593 million in 2006, an average annual growth rate of 277 percent. Blackwater went from having 16 guards in Afghanistan to more than 850 personnel in Iraq.

By the end of 2006, Blackwater had received more than $1 billion in government contracts. That doesn't include classified contracts, including providing security at CIA sites overseas.

The CIA contracts are lucrative, according to a document Blackwater filed in a federal lawsuit.

Blackwater had a contract since 2003 to protect a CIA site in Pakistan, the document said. "The profit potential is high (25%+ margin)," because of the classified nature of the budgets, and the knowledge gained from past performance on existing contracts.

During congressional testimony in October, Erik Prince said that Blackwater made a 10 percent profit on his State Department contracts, but he declined to elaborate or discuss the company's annual profits. He also declined to comment for this report. But there is a healthy markup for the company's services: Blackwater bills the State Department $1,221 for a security guard earning $500 a day.

For all the controversy, Blackwater has an unblemished record on its main task in Iraq: None of the diplomats in the company's care have been killed or wounded. Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy recently told The New York Times that the diplomats could not function in Iraq without Blackwater: "If the contractors were removed, we would have to leave Iraq."

A company that has banked more than $1 billion in federal payments since Sept. 11, 2001, doesn't sound like a small business, but Blackwater says it is.

For a company providing security services, the threshold for a small business is $17 million in annual revenue. Blackwater passed that threshold in 2003, yet continued to list itself as a small business.

In 2006, Blackwater's aviation division won a $91 million contract for air charter work in Guam, a contract the Navy had set aside for small businesses. Two losing bidders challenged the award, saying Blackwater had more than 1,500 employees, the threshold for an aviation contract. An administrative judge ruled for Blackwater, saying the company's 1,000-plus guards working overseas did not count as employees.

Blackwater's contention that its guards are not employees has generated a lot of controversy.

Last year, an Internal Revenue Service hearing officer ruled that a Blackwater security guard was an employee, not an independent contractor. U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman has asked the IRS to investigate whether the company used the independent contractor designation to avoid paying federal taxes. Blackwater disputes Waxman's complaint. If that ruling were applied to Blackwater's entire work force, the company could be on the hook for $50 million in unpaid Medicare and Social Security taxes that companies must pay for their workers.

Prince, Blackwater's founder, is known for his libertarian views. He touts the virtues of the free market and entrepreneurs. But the company is not averse to exploiting contracting loopholes and government giveaways.

Blackwater teamed up with the Chenega, an Alaskan Native American tribe of 69 people, to guard a missile defense installation in northern Japan. As a native-owned company, Chenega can win special no-bid contracts because of rules crafted by Alaska's powerful U.S. Sen. Ted Stevens.

But to fulfill the terms, Chenega needed a partner to supply the guards, so it turned to Blackwater. The contract was worth $5 million for Blackwater in 2006 and $6 million for the first half of 2007.

In North Carolina, the Department of Commerce approved a $120,000 grant for Blackwater to support the company's production of its Grizzly armored vehicle. The department projected that Blackwater would file for $637,500 in tax credits for the same project.

Despite the phenomenal growth, Prince has been quietly looking for more investors. At the end of April, the giant hedge fund Cerberus said it had decided against investing as much as $200 million in Blackwater. After news broke of Cerberus' interest, Blackwater President Gary Jackson sent an e-mail message saying the company was anticipating even more growth, the Wall Street Journal reported.

"The company has "had two successive quarters of unprecedented growth," Jackson wrote, and is "exploring multiple avenues to finance our continued expansion."
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/new ... s/1575255/
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

Respuesta oficial de Blackwater respecto a los comentarios sobre su nuevo centro de entrenamiento en San Diego:
"We have no doubt that everyone from the Mayor to members of the local community wants what is best for the City of San Diego," said Brian Bonfiglio, a Blackwater vice president who lives in San Diego. "We share that goal, which is why we want to provide San Diego, a city that has always supported its men and women in uniform, with a superior training facility. We have followed the proper procedures throughout the permitting process and look forward to clearing up some of the misunderstandings surrounding the project."

The following points address some of the key issues and questions that have surfaced in recent weeks:


-- History. Blackwater has been training U.S. Navy sailors ever since the tragic attack on the U.S.S. Cole, after which the U.S. Navy identified a need to augment its existing training programs to better prepare sailors for potential threats they might face abroad. Blackwater has been training Navy sailors in rented facilities in San Diego for five years.

-- The new facility. The 61,000-square-foot space is located in an industrial warehouse park. The training facility will include a ship simulator to train sailors for crisis situations at sea, classrooms, and an indoor, soundproofed, state-of-the art target range.

-- Purpose. The proposed training facility will be used to train military and law-enforcement personnel in safety procedures and for real-life scenarios so they can be prepared to deal with a variety of potential threats.

-- Precedents. A privately run, California-certified police academy is located in Otay Mesa, less than a quarter of a mile from the Blackwater facility. The county has welcomed other defense contractors into the Otay Mesa district and is home to at least 16 ranges.

-- Permits. Blackwater and its affiliates involved in the San Diego facility first applied for permits with the city of San Diego Development Services Department at the beginning of the year. Because Blackwater's construction affiliate, Raven Development Group, was responsible for the initial construction work for the facility, its name was one of those included on the permits. The City has acknowledged that it is typical for a variety of entities to be involved in the permitting process for a project. This is no different from three or four developers or contractors being involved with the early stages of a project. As contractors come and go, so do business relationships. But those changes do not affect the validity of the permits, which relate to a location, not an individual.

-- Initial determination was correct. The city's Director of Development Services took the proper course of approving all permits having to do with the facility. San Diego's Director of Development Services, Kelly Broughton, told KPBS on May 20th that Blackwater's facility "complied with our municipal code and the California Building Code." It is a vocational school, which is clearly permitted, after ministerial review, in Otay Mesa. "Ministerial review" means that city officials, including electrical, structural, and fire/safety inspectors have checked to see whether the structure meets all relevant San Diego Municipal Code provisions. All such inspectors have approved Blackwater's Otay facility.

-- Transparency. Blackwater has been completely forthcoming in its dealings with San Diego officials throughout the permitting process. Every planner, every inspector, and every official has known they were dealing with Blackwater. Throughout the process, all individuals working on the project identified themselves to city staff as representing Blackwater. As a matter of fact, the business permit issued to Blackwater in connection with this project makes clear that Blackwater is the entity that will do business at the Otay Mesa facility, and all city officials inspecting the property were greeted by individuals wearing Blackwater "polo" shirts, and providing Blackwater business cards. Although it had no obligation to do so, Blackwater officials have provided facility tours for City auditors, members of the media and others.

-- What it isn't. Critics of the project have used blatant fabrications --claiming that the facility will be used for border security or immigration purposes -- to build support for their opposition of the facility. The proposed facility will be used for training alone and this kind of propaganda should be discredited immediately.Blackwater is committed to working with the people of San Diego and City officials to clarify any questions or misinformation that surround our work in San Diego. In doing so, over the past several days, Blackwater has sent extremely detailed letters to all city officials spelling out all relevant facts and providing exhaustive legal analysis. Copies of those letters will be made available on request.

Blackwater has followed all of the proper rules and processes for a training facility of this type, and City officials publicly have acknowledged that we have complied with the permitting process. Blackwater now hopes that it will be able to move forward with the important work of providing superior training for U.S. military and law enforcement personnel.

Founded in 1997 to support the training needs of the United States military and law enforcement communities, Blackwater has trained more than 100,000 local police officers, SWAT team members, homeland security professionals, and military personnel.

Anne E. Tyrrell of Blackwater, atyrrell@blackwaterusa.com,
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

El pasado día 13, al hilo de Blackwater y el SOCOM, dije esto:
Loopster escribió:a finales de Mayo se presentará por primera vez los nuevos equipos que Blackwater ha estado diseñando para el SOCOM, puede que haya sorpresas.
Ha sido El Tirador Solitario (blog recomendadísimo) el primero en comprobar que no me tiraba el farol, aunque obviamente no conocía todos los detalles :wink: :
DefenseNews escribió:Blackwater USA and Raytheon unveiled a prototype six-passenger Joint Light Tactical Vehicle at the U.S. Special Operations Industry Conference in Tampa, Fla., on May 21, revealing their teamed-up effort to build a survivable, mobile next-generation Humvee.

"Our vehicle will go faster and carry more weight safely than any other JLTV," said Blackwater USA Vice President Bill Mathews. "With Raytheon being the integrator for so many ground vehicles for C4ISR, our JLTV will have the technological equivalent of an F-18 cockpit."

The Blackwater-Raytheon partnership aims to combine the fast, off-road vehicle expertise with the systems integration and C4ISR abilities of Raytheon.

Imagen

Made by Ares Systems Group, its appliqué armor uses add-on composite materials designed to provide more protection at lower weight than traditional materials.

"The integral armor packages are exceptional, and the appliqué makes this one really tough, capable vehicle," said Mathews. "We will be providing protection that is on par with MRAPs [Mine Resistant Ambush Protected vehicles] in a package that is mobile."

Raytheon officials praised the partnership and emphasized the JLTV program's survivability.

In the coming weeks, the Blackwater-Raytheon JLTV prototype will be tested with gunfire, high temperatures and other combat conditions, Mathews said.

The Army plans to award three 27-month JLTV development contracts at the end of June.
Yo me esperaba que fuera el sistema de vigilancia y control de los Mk.III que están usando en Iraq, o los nuevos uniformes de combate de Crye, pero este Humvee que parece que se ha comido un RG33 tiene mejor pinta aún.

El Grizzly Mk.VII... aquí hemos visto el Mk.I que fue el primer diseño, el Mk.II con el diseño actual, el Mk.III de tres ejes, ... ¿dónde estarán los Mk.IV/V/VI? :roll:
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
yoyimbo
Jefe de Analisis
Jefe de Analisis
Mensajes: 407
Registrado: 22 Mar 2008 13:15
Ubicación: Sacudiéndome el polvo...

Mensaje por yoyimbo »

Habrà que ver que es lo que pasa cuando hagan todas las pruebas, aunque me da que BW no tendrà sorpresas, estoy convencido de que ya les hicieron de todo.

Como siempre, info de primera mano Loopster.

Un saludo
All our ignorance brings us closer to death...
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

Nada yoyimbo, yo estoy ya mandando emails como un loco para ver más de lo que presentaron en SOFIC, el Mk.VII no fue la única novedad por lo visto :roll:


Brian Bonfinglio (BW West) ha tenido que pedir a las autoridades federales que obliguen al ayuntamiento de San Diego a cumplir el contrato por el que Blackwater tiene autorización para el centro de instrucción de la US Navy para Force Protection y VBSS... el alcalde y el jefe de proyectos de la ciudad de San Diego están intentando politizar las actividades de Blackwater allí todo lo que pueden, simplemente porque quieren votos ya que la reelección la tienen el 3 de Junio.

Van dados estos payasos, con la US Navy no se juega, menos aún en San Diego, donde representan el 80 y tantos % de la actividad de la ciudad :twisted:
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
Loopster
Jefe de Operaciones
Jefe de Operaciones
Mensajes: 3298
Registrado: 10 Ene 2007 12:32
Ubicación: 22 Bunker

Mensaje por Loopster »

Hoy es el día en que Blackwater San Diego tiene que abrir sus puertas para los primeros alumnos de la US Navy que van a formarse en manejo de armamento, seguridad y control marítimo.

También es el día anterior a las elecciones en San Diego.

Y el día en que el Tribunal Federal de California tiene que decir si el Alcalde Sanders dice tener razón cuando afirma que Blackwater empleó Raven Development como "tapadera" para evitar que el proyecto llevara su nombre.

En fin, supongo que la fotografía del Alcalde Sanders estrechando la mano del jefe de instructores mientras todos a su alrededor llevan camisetas de Blackwater debería ser lo bastante clara para el juez :roll:
Cry havoc and unleash the hawgs of war - Otatsiihtaissiiststakio piksi makamo ta psswia
Avatar de Usuario
yoyimbo
Jefe de Analisis
Jefe de Analisis
Mensajes: 407
Registrado: 22 Mar 2008 13:15
Ubicación: Sacudiéndome el polvo...

Mensaje por yoyimbo »

jajjajajajajaj.... debería debería.... pero quizàs no lo vea con claridad... :shock:

un saludo
All our ignorance brings us closer to death...
Responder

Volver a “Private Military Companies, PMCs”