Publicado: 15 Jul 2008 12:53
Otra entrevista a Erik Prince, esta vez le toca a Army Times:
Pedazo de entrevista... Plaza Nisour, China, Azerbayán, jefe para Iraq del contrato WPPS, etc etcErik Prince exclusive interview
Blackwater CEO responds to firm’s controversial reputation, place in military operations
Posted : Monday Jul 14, 2008 14:06:23 EDT
Blackwater Worldwide is the best-known of the private military companies whose personnel have become a ubiquitous presence in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Founded in 1997 by Erik Prince, a former Navy SEAL officer, Blackwater has grown into a firm with 600 full-time employees in the U.S. and 2,000 contractors serving abroad, most in Afghanistan and Iraq. The company’s wide-ranging business ventures include personal security services, manufacture of combat vehicles, operation of a fleet of aircraft and much more.
But Blackwater’s reputation has been tainted by several high-profile incidents that have garnered negative publicity, most recently a Sept. 16, 2007, incident in Baghdad’s Nisour Square in which a Blackwater personal security detail escorting a State Department convoy allegedly shot 17 Iraqi civilians.
In a July 7 meeting with the Military Times editors and reporters, Prince vigorously defended his company, which he said had a guiding principle of “operational excellence.”
The following are extracts from that meeting, edited for brevity and clarity.
Q. Under what constraints are you operating when it comes to publicly explaining or defending yourself against the allegations that have been leveled at you over the last couple of years?
A. We go to work [in Iraq] for the State Department, who by contract says you will have no contact with the media. So 99 out of 100 times, we have to say, “No comment to the media,” and we still try to abide [by] that however we can. This is kind of an anomaly, me going to an editorial board, but, you know, I’m here not really to talk about our State Department stuff but about the other stuff we do for DoD and aviation and etcetera.
But that is a difficult quandary that we’re put into where we’re a punching bag of sorts for folks that want to attack whatever is going on in Iraq and we’re not able to put the facts out.
We’ve done well over 20,000 missions now for the State Department. Probably point-4 of 1 percent of all those missions have resulted in the discharge of a firearm — not 4 percent, point-4 percent of 1 percent. So the idea that the guys are trigger happy and shooting up the place is just grossly inaccurate, and still, no one under our care has been killed or injured.
Q. Do you think the State Department could or should have done more to defend you?
A. I’m not here to criticize the State Department at all. … They have a difficult job there, we have a difficult job there. And I’m proud to say that no one under our care has been killed or injured, and we’re big boys, and we can take those lumps, and I’m honored that they renewed our work, that they see the value that we provide them.
Q. You recently put a retired Delta Force officer in charge of your State Department contract. What changes has Blackwater made to how your people conduct themselves downrange since he came on board?
A. His rotation to that job was a normal career rotation in the business. That job is a pressure cooker and the phone never turns off, and there’s always things happening overseas.
State Department has put cameras and DS [Diplomatic Security] agents in with our convoys. That’s something we’d asked for back in 2005 already in writing. [Our attitude] was, don’t take our word for it — let the camera or the government DS agent be that third-party arbiter to avoid the kind of incidents which, you know, got very overblown last September.
Q. Is that DS agent the senior guy in the convoy now?
A. Yes. He is the last word.
Q. We’ve heard that there has been a series of changes made that might improve the way people perceive Blackwater personnel in combat zones, such as no more goatees, no visible tattoos and no alcohol when deployed.
A. Well, we’ve had a no-alcohol policy for a long time. The haircut and uniform presentation is very, very clearly defined for State Department.
Our problem is there’s 170-some security companies in Iraq, and because really since 2003 we’ve protected the most al Qaida-worthy targets, we would constantly get calls, even now, even today, we get calls that Blackwater guys were involved in a shooting or Blackwater guys were captured or killed here or there, and when we go and investigate, and they weren’t within 100 miles of that because we know where each of the vehicles are. We track them with Blue Force Tracker so we know what they’re doing and what they’re not doing.
Blackwater kind of became the Xerox or the Kleenex brand name for the industry, [so] that any armed Americans in a Suburban or an SUV were “Blackwater guys.” Well, no, we only have a total of 1,000 people in Iraq, and only 600 or so of those would be protective folks and the rest would be gate guards, logisticians, mechanics for the helicopters, air crews — that kind of thing.
Q. Where does the FBI investigation into the Sept. 16 incident stand, and was it established that the Blackwater personnel were fired on first?
A. The FBI investigation is still ongoing. I can tell you there’s a radiator that came out of that [Blackwater] truck that had AK rounds lodged in it, and the reason the vehicle was stuck there was because there was an AK round that cut the coolant hose and the curse of modern engines is if you got no coolant, the computer won’t let you run the engine.
Q. The U.S. government and the Iraqis have been negotiating a status of forces agreement. There have been reports in the past week that rather than cordoning private security people off as protected under that SOFA, that perhaps they would be subject to local jurisdiction.
A. We’ve heard a lot of speculation on that. We’ve heard no definitive word from our government customers on that, and we’re standing by for further orders.
Q. If your people could be prosecuted under Iraqi law, would you maintain the agreement that you have with the State Department?
A. A significant change like that would certainly cause a whole bunch of things to be renegotiated. That’s a substantial change.
Q. Do you work for other countries, or just for the U.S.?
A We do some training work for other countries, some helicopter support and training and maintenance and that kind of stuff. In Azerbaijan, we were hired by DoD to build for them a naval special warfare capability to defend the oil platforms and interdict weapons and drugs and whatever else in the southern Caspian [Sea]. And with a very small team, never more than four to six guys, we built over about a year and a half a unit, and we took them from zero capability to doing underway ship-boarding in 10 months. And we also redid their entire base, the pool, climbing tower, the shoothouse, the ranges, the boathouse, everything — and for a very, very, very small fraction of what it would cost DoD to do it.
Q. Have you turned down any countries?
A. Sure. We had a lot of inquiries from China a couple years ago wanting police training before the Olympics, and that’s just not something we wanted to do.
Q. What’s the difference between working for the Azeris and working for the Chinese?
A. Well, China has plenty of human rights challenges and we didn’t want any of our training to be used in another Tiananmen Square-type faceoff. Simple.
Q. Another difference is also the U.S. government said they wanted you to go to Azerbaijan. They didn’t ask you to go to China.
A. Correct. They hired us to do that [in Azerbaijan].
Q. Because Azerbaijan doesn’t have the best human rights record, either.
A. In this case, they’re trying to build a small, focused capability to do maritime protection. But it was something that was in the U.S. foreign policy interest, and our training has to align with that.
Whatever we do overseas has to align with that.








